![]() can be even more of a shot in the arm for them as they grow,” said Jon Moramarco, an industry consultant with bw166. “These new ones that are permissible under (the federal agency’s ruling). Gallo’s Barefoot winery has had success with that package size because it qualified as a permissible 1-liter container under previous regulations. That would apply to the 250 ml can that is already popular on retail shelves in four packs. Most notably, the rule will allow wineries to sell smaller individual wine cans already in the marketplace. ![]() They are reliable and predictable,” said Tracy Genesen, general counsel of the Wine Institute, the major trade group for the California wine industry. “We are encouraged that the federal government will still have them (the standards) in place … because what they do is they create a national framework for wineries to comply with. The 750 ml bottle still remains the overwhelming choice for retail sale though some wine companies like Francis Ford Coppola Winery in Geyserville and E. Instead, the agency added the new sizes to the previous standard of nine different sizes ranging from 3 liters to 50 ml containers. That plan was scrapped after criticism from wine trade groups and wholesalers. The ruling comes after the bureau originally proposed eliminating all containers for wine and spirits products. 29 unveiled the regulation to allow wineries to use three new sizes for their products: 355 ml (12 ounces), 250 ml and 200 ml cans. The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau on Dec. A federal rule issued last week likely will lead to more wineries placing wine for sale in aluminum cans, a trend gaining traction in both the beer and hard cider sectors, analysts said.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |